Impact of Pre-Conditioning Clofarabine on Engraftment and Cell Recovery in Allogeneic Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide
Abstract
Introduction: For relapsed or refractory AML (r/r AML), an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment. Yet, relapse rates are high, and non-relapse mortality is concerning due to the incidence of infectious complications and graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Clofarabine, a purine nucleoside antimetabolite, is a safe and effective conditioning agent that can be used for high-risk leukemia. We demonstrated Clofarabine/busulfan conditioning is an effective regimen for r/r AML. More recently, we reported its efficacy using Clofarabine as a pre-conditioning (pre-Clo) before allo-HCT for non-remission hematological malignancies, which suggests this strategy can be expanded for the application to high-risk AML such as TP53 biallelic mutated MDS/AML. Despite the intensity of this regimen, the engraftment of patients with pre-Clo was comparable to others, including lymphocyte recovery. We hypothesized that pre-Clo may give additional immunosuppression, which may benefit high-risk hematological malignancies by facilitating donor T-cell chimerism.
Methods: In this retrospective study at our institution, we included 175 peripheral blood allo-HCT patients who received PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis from April 2017 to March 2024. Using the propensity-score matching, we analyzed the effect of pre-Clo (N=19) on neutrophil/platelet/lymphocyte engraftment and donor cell chimerism achievement compared to a cohort without pre-Clo (control; N=19). Propensity matching factors included age, patient sex, disease (AML, ALL, CML/MDS), HCT Comorbidity Index, Karnofsky Performance Status, number of prior HCT, donor type, and conditioning intensity. Because pre-conditioning is intentionally reserved for those with active disease, disease status, and bone marrow blast percentage before transplant were not matched. Engraftment was defined as the first day achieving >20,000/µL platelets, >200/µL lymphocyte counts, and the first of three consecutive days achieving >500/µL neutrophils, respectively.
Results: Median age was 49 and 57 for pre-Clo and the control cohort, respectively, and AML patients comprised 63.2% of each group (pre-Clo: 15.8% ALL, 21.1% CML/MDS; control: 21.1% ALL, 15.8% CML/MDS). Overall survival at 1-year post-transplant was encouraging at 42% for pre-Clo (58% for the control cohort). Of note, these two groups vary regarding disease activity, given that most pre-Clo cases were non-CR (89.5% in pre-Clo, compared to 10.5% in the control group). As expected, there was no difference between both groups found in neutrophil (p=0.785) or lymphocyte (p=0.299) engraftment. Pre-Clo may be associated with delayed platelet engraftment (p=0.141). There were no differences in donor total or T-cell chimerism at 30, 60, or 90 days after allo-HCT. Still, when stratified with those who received HLA-matched donors (47.4% of each cohort), the pre-Clo group showed increased donor total and T-cell chimerism at day 60 after allo-HCT (total cell p=0.026; T-cell p=0.029). This effect continued to day 90 only for T-cell chimerism (total cell p=0.768; T-cell p=0.029), and may suggest enhanced immunosuppressive activity of pre-Clo, and anticipated enhanced graft-versus-leukemia effect, specifically in the context of an HLA-matched donor. These trends were not observed in patients receiving HLA-mismatched transplants because HLA-mismatched, including haploidentical donors, facilitate full donor T-cell chimerism by themselves, masking any influence pre-Clo might have. Further, post-transplant CD4+ counts appeared to trend lower in the pre-Clo group, continuing to around 6 months (limited patient data available; pre-Clo N=6 and control N=7, p=0.073), which could be concerning for a higher incidence of infectious complications in the pre-Clo group.
Conclusion: Considering these trends and the similar lymphocyte recovery in both groups, more precise analysis of lymphocyte fractions after pre-Clo should be undertaken. Additional investigation is warranted to validate the efficacy of pre-Clo followed by allo-HCT for r/r AML and other hematological malignancies by understanding how this may affect GVHD and graft-versus-leukemia on top of the anti-tumor effect of Clofarabine by itself.